Will diplomacy be US nuclear deterrent for Iran?

‘U.S. attack cannot stop Iran’s N-program’ – Better late than never, finally White house is banking on diplomatic measures instead of military action to act as deterrent for Iran’s nuclear program. Speaking on behalf of President Bush, White House Spokesperson dismissed prospects of military attack against Iran’s nuclear facilities. Is it that Bush administration waking to reality that violence begets only violence and military attack is an expensive futile exercise? Experts have warned that any attack will only delay Iran’s nuclear plans and encourage them to acquire some more nuclear expertise and nuclear weapons. US also lacks intelligence information on number of nuclear facilities the country has throughout Iran. Mulling military action will make Iran bury its facilities too to be detected from air. So is it lack of intelligence information and precise evidence that’s forcing Bush to use diplomacy here? Why is Bush toeing a soft line for Iran? That too while US troops are still parked in Iraq and it hounded and hanged Saddam for precisely being a nuclear threat. There are doubts looming large that U.S lacked intelligent information justifying Iraq war as well. With truth leaking out of White House, maybe Bush doesn’t want to repeat the same mistake and act like global superhero trying to wipe out evil forces. Hope US accepts its limitations that it cannot be global police on nuclear facilities. Modern civilization needs to be free from weapons of mass destruction. We are still haunted by Hiroshima and Nagasaki memories. But wars only justify need of weapons. World needs more of negotiations and diplomatic measures to resolve conflicts. source:Presstv