First thing first, nothing is permanent but change.



So even the tiny establishments of U.S. in the countries smeared in war and anarchism will fade with the time. As so far the utmost luxurious living standards of Americans in the ‘Americas’ located in war-torn countries, it is their might, money and their life style super imposed on a poor country would definitely look ugly to many. However, one cannot simply help it. In addition, it is not even a matter of serious concern.



Long love affair



Even then, it may give indication that they may stay for perhaps too long, but still even for a short period of time Americans, assumable, would live like this.



Irrespective of all this kind of reflections, know that the Americans would leave only when their mission, their ambitious agendas (and hidden agendas) are accomplished.



The Hillary question?



However, the more serious question is whether triumph of democrats, if they do, at White House will change this imperialist course or not. If we speculate the situation on practical level, the answer will be a clear, no.



First these strategic occupations have both implications one, these forces are stationed strategically and it has huge economic implications as well. Strategically, U.S. obviously aims to consolidate its position in the Middle East region primarily due to energy point of view.



The Supply chain strategy



Secondly, it has strategic interest in the poorly resourceful Central Asian region. Why in Central Asian region? From economic point of view, U.S. trade with China is growing at a rapid speed, the volume of trade between these two nations are the largest in the world but strategically they are on two poles.



The Central Asian region hold a very important position in oil and gas supply to European nations or beyond. Fairly clear, having secured sources of oil and gas is not important but its safe and less costly supply is equally important.



Kubla Khan, redux



Apparently, three countries are in race to establish hegemony in these regions, Russia, China and U.S. Therefore, in this condition U.S. will not be willing to destroy its bases in the Middle East and Central Asian region, no matter who is sleeping in the White House Republican or Democrat.



Home, sweet home



Other compulsions at home include that already over 300 billion has already been spent, the figure is still going higher, in the middle east region, and being a bloody (literally) business-minded nation, the U.S. will not withdraw till it will not gain profit from this investment.



Other than this, in U.S. elections only voters are not important but the funds as well. The war expenditure always benefits the U.S. giant companies and it is difficult to assume that they would stay idle in U.S. politics. It is the U.S. companies which get the maximum contracts in the restructuring projects of war torn nations, on behalf of the U.S.



Therefore, in this condition, it is very unlikely that they would leave this country, be it Democrat or Republican. So better, let them have America away from America.



Read More